Next: Neyman Pearson Theorem
Up: Evaluation of and Construction
Previous: Unbiased and Consistent Tests
  Contents
When
and
are both simple, the error sizes
and
are uniquely defined. In this section we require that both the null
hypothesis and alternative hypothesis are simple, so that in effect, the
parameter space is a set consisting of exactly
points. We will define a
best test for testing
against
, and in 3.2.3 we will
prove a Theorem that provides a method for determining a best test.
Let
denote the density function of a random variable
. Let
denote a random sample from this distribution and
consider the simple hypothesis
:
and the simple
alternative
:
. So
One repetition of the experiment will result in a particular n-tuple,
(
). Consider a set
, which is a collection of
n-tuples having size
that is,
has the property that
It follows that
can be thought of as a critical region for the test.
Specifically, if the observed n-tuple
falls in our
pre-selected
, we will reject
. However, if
were true, then
intuitively the `best' critical region would be the one having the highest
probability of containing
. Formalizing this notion,
we have the following definition.
Definition
9..5
C is called the best critical region, (BCR)
of size
for testing the simple
against the simple
if,
- (a)
-
- (b)
-
for every other
(of size
).
This definition can be stated in terms of power.
Suppose that there is one of these subsets, say C, such that when
is true,
the power of the test associated with C is at least as great as the power of
the test associated with each other
.
Definition
9..6
A test of the simple hypothesis
versus the
simple alternative
that has the smallest
(or equivalently,
the largest
) among tests with no larger
is called
most powerful.
Example
9..4
Suppose
. Let
denote the probability function of
. Consider
,
. The table below gives the values of
,
and
for
.
| x |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
f(x; ) |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
f(x; ) |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
f(x; )/f(x; ) |
32 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Using
to test
against
, we shall first assign significance level
and want a best critical region of this size. Now
and
are possible critical regions and there
is no other subset with
.
So either
or
is the best
critical region for this
. If we use
then
P(
)
1/1024 and
P(rejecting

is true)

P(rejecting

is true),
an unacceptable situation. On the other hand, if we use
then
and
P(rejecting

is true)

P(rejecting

is true),
a much more desirable state of affairs. So
is the best critical region of
size
for testing
against
.
It should be noted that, in this problem, the best critical region, C, is
found by including in C the point (or points) at which
is
small in comparison with
. This suggests that
in general, the ratio
provides a tool by which to find
a best critical region for a certain given value of
.
The theorem in the following section provides the methodology for deriving
the most powerful test for testing simple
against simple
.
Next: Neyman Pearson Theorem
Up: Evaluation of and Construction
Previous: Unbiased and Consistent Tests
  Contents
Bob Murison
2000-10-31